Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 07:25

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Has anyone been spanked by their parents after becoming an adult?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What are the latest trends in artificial intelligence for 2025?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
MindsEye Is Officially The Worst Reviewed Game Of The Year So Far - TheGamer
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
How Can AI Researchers Save Energy? By Going Backward. - Quanta Magazine
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Early AI investor Elad Gil finds his next big bet: AI-powered rollups - TechCrunch
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
tvOS 26 hints at a big hardware change for the new Apple TV 4K - 9to5Mac
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Leonardo DiCaprio’s Girlfriend Has Major Wardrobe Malfunction at Bezos Wedding Party - Yahoo